Snowflake Breach Analysis: A Technical Perspective

The recent Snowflake breach has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity community, highlighting the importance of robust security measures in cloud-based data storage and analytics platforms. In this blog post we will explore the technical analysis of the breach, examining the possible attack vectors, tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) employed by the attackers.

Initial Disclosure

Snowflake initially disclosed the potential unauthorized access on May 23, 2024, stating that the incidents resulted from compromised user credentials rather than any inherent vulnerabilities or flaws within Snowflake’s product itself. This initial disclosure suggests that the breach may have been caused by weak authentication and authorization mechanisms, allowing attackers to gain access to sensitive data.

Possible Attack Vectors

Several attack vectors could have been exploited in this breach:

1. Compromised User Credentials: As mentioned in the initial disclosure, compromised user credentials might have provided the entry point for attackers. This highlights the importance of implementing robust password policies, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and regular account reviews.
2. Phishing Attacks: Phishing emails or messages could have been used to trick Snowflake users into revealing their login credentials or other sensitive information. This emphasizes the need for employee education on phishing tactics and the implementation of anti-phishing measures.
3. Lateral Movement: Once attackers gained access, they might have moved laterally within the Snowflake environment, exploiting vulnerabilities in underlying infrastructure or using stolen credentials to escalate privileges.

Lets explore each of these a little further.

Compromised User Credentials

How could this have occurred? Is there any evidence of user credentials from Snowflake on the internet or darkweb? Compromised user credentials could have occurred through various means, including:

• Phishing attacks: As mentioned earlier, phishing emails or messages could have tricked Snowflake users into revealing their login credentials. This emphasizes the need for employee education on phishing tactics and implementing anti-phishing measures.
• Infostealing malware: Malware like infostealers (e.g., AZORult, Raccoon) can steal user credentials from infected devices. If an attacker deployed such malware within Snowflake’s environment or compromised a device used by a Snowflake employee, they could have obtained sensitive information.
• Weak passwords: Snowflake users might have used weak or easily guessable passwords, making it easier for attackers to gain access.
• Insider threat: A malicious insider with authorized access could have intentionally or unintentionally leaked credentials.

As for evidence of user credentials from Snowflake on the internet or darkweb:

• Leaks and breaches: There have been instances where compromised user credentials from other organizations were leaked online. However, I couldn’t find any specific evidence linking Snowflake’s user credentials to the darkweb or public leaks.
• Dark web marketplaces: Some dark web marketplaces (e.g., Joker’s Stash) have sold stolen credentials in the past. While it’s possible that Snowflake’s user credentials might be available on these platforms, I couldn’t find any concrete evidence.

Phishing Attacks

How could a phishing attack have provided a malicious actor access to critical information within the Snowflake systems and network? A successful phishing attack could have granted attackers access to critical information through various means:

• Email-based attacks: Phishing emails or messages could have tricked Snowflake employees into revealing login credentials, allowing attackers to gain access.
• Spear phishing: Targeted phishing attacks could have been used to compromise specific Snowflake employees with elevated privileges, granting attackers access to sensitive areas of the network.
• Social engineering: Attackers might have used social engineering tactics (e.g., pretexting) to trick Snowflake employees into revealing sensitive information or performing actions that grant access.

To prevent such attacks:

• Employee education: Educate Snowflake employees on phishing tactics and the importance of verifying requests from unknown sources.
• Anti-phishing measures: Implement anti-phishing measures, such as email filtering and monitoring, to detect and block suspicious activity.
• Multi-factor authentication: Enforce MFA to add an extra layer of security for sensitive areas of the network.‍

‍Lateral Movement

If the attackers did indeed gain access to a low-level system, how would they have performed lateral movement around the Snowflake environment? Assuming attackers gained access to a low-level system, they could have used various techniques to move laterally within the Snowflake environment:

• Privilege escalation: Attackers might have exploited vulnerabilities or used stolen credentials to escalate privileges and gain access to higher-level systems.
• Network reconnaissance: They could have conducted network reconnaissance using tools like Nmap or OpenVAS to identify potential entry points, vulnerable services, or sensitive data.
• Lateral movement tools: Attackers might have employed lateral movement tools (e.g., Mimikatz, PowerSploit) to move between systems and maintain persistence within the environment.
• Data exfiltration: Once inside, attackers could have exfiltrated sensitive data using various methods, such as encrypting and transmitting it via email or cloud storage services.

To prevent lateral movement:

• Network segmentation: Implement network segmentation to limit access and restrict movement between systems.
• Vulnerability management: Regularly update and patch vulnerabilities in Snowflake’s infrastructure to reduce the attack surface.
• Monitoring and detection: Implement monitoring and detection tools (e.g., SIEM, IDS) to detect and respond to lateral movement attempts.

Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs)

The attackers may have employed various TTPs to carry out the breach:

1. Credential Dumping: Attackers could have used tools like Mimikatz or John the Ripper to dump user credentials, allowing them to gain access to sensitive data.
2. Privilege Escalation: The attackers might have exploited vulnerabilities in Snowflake’s infrastructure or used stolen credentials to escalate privileges and move laterally within the environment.
3. Data Exfiltration: Once inside, the attackers could have exfiltrated sensitive data using various methods, such as encrypting and transmitting it via email or cloud storage services.

Mitigation Strategies

To prevent similar breaches in the future, Snowflake and its customers can implement the following mitigation strategies:

1. Implement Strong Authentication and Authorization: Enforce robust password policies, MFA, and regular account reviews to minimize the risk of compromised user credentials.
2. Monitor for Lateral Movement: Implement security information and event management (SIEM) systems to detect and respond to lateral movement attempts.
3. Regularly Update Infrastructure: Ensure that underlying infrastructure is up-to-date with the latest patches and updates to reduce the attack surface.
4. Employee Education: Educate employees on phishing tactics, social engineering, and other common attack vectors to prevent initial access.

‍Want to Prevent Future?

The recent security breach at Snowflake serves as a stark reminder of the importance of proactive cybersecurity measures. As a leading provider of Security Operations Centre (SOC) services, SOC365 is committed to helping organizations like Snowflake protect their sensitive data and prevent similar incidents.

How SOC365 Could Have Helped:

1. 24/7 Monitoring: Our team of expert analysts would have been monitoring Snowflake’s network and systems around the clock, detecting potential threats and responding quickly to minimize damage.
2. Advanced Threat Detection: We would have used advanced threat detection tools to identify and block suspicious activity, preventing attackers from gaining a foothold in the environment.
3. Vulnerability Management: Our team would have worked with Snowflake’s IT department to identify and patch vulnerabilities before they could be exploited by attackers.

Get in Touch:

If you’re concerned about the security of your organization’s data and want to learn more about how SOC365 can help, please don’t hesitate to reach out. We’d be happy to schedule a consultation or provide a customized quote for our services.

Don’t wait until it’s too late. Take the first step towards securing your organization’s data today.

In Closing

The Snowflake breach serves as a reminder of the importance of robust security measures in cloud-based data storage and analytics platforms. By understanding the possible attack vectors, TTPs, and mitigation strategies, we can better prepare for future breaches and protect sensitive data. We will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates on any new developments or findings.

‍

‍